Thursday, February 19, 2015

GOP DOUBLE-CROSSING TRAITORS

Ann Coulter - February 18, 2015 - GOP DOUBLE-CROSSING TRAITORS

GOP DOUBLE-CROSSING TRAITORS

Now that a federal judge has held Obama's illegal
executive amnesty unconstitutional, perhaps U.S. senators will remember
that they swore to uphold the Constitution, too.



Back when they needed our votes before the last election,
Republicans were hairy-chested warriors, vowing to block Obama's
unconstitutional "executive amnesty" -- if only voters gave them a
Senate majority. The resulting Republican landslide suggested some
opposition to amnesty.


Heading into the election, college professor Dave Brat took out
the sitting House majority leader and amnesty supporter Eric Cantor in a
primary, despite being outspent 40-1. It was the greatest upset in
history since the 1980 "Miracle on Ice" at the Lake Placid Olympics:
Never before has a House majority leader been defeated in a primary. And
Brat did it by an astonishing 55.5 percent to 45.5 percent.


Again, the voters seemed to be expressing disquiet with amnesty.


After that, even amnesty-supporting Sen. Lamar Alexander,
R-Tenn., was denouncing Obama's executive amnesty. "If the president
were to do that," he said, "and we have a Republican majority in the
United States Senate, why, we have a number of options that we don't now
have to remind him to read Article I of the Constitution."


Poll after poll showed Americans ranking illegal immigration as
the No. 1 most important problem facing the nation. We haven't changed
our minds. Last week, an Associated Press-Gfk poll showed that Obama's
single most unpopular policy is his position on illegal immigration.


In other words, Obamacare is more popular than amnesty. That's like losing a popularity contest to Ted Bundy.


Since at least 2006, voters have insistently told pollsters they
don't want amnesty. Seemingly bulletproof Republican congressmen have
lost their seats over amnesty. President Bush lost the entire House of
Representatives over amnesty. What else do we have to do to convince you
we don't want amnesty, Republicans? Make it a host on "The View"?

Before the election, then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell
complained that Obama's decision to delay his executive amnesty until
after the election was a ploy to prevent Americans from "hold(ing) his
party accountable in the November elections."


But voters went ahead and held Obama accountable! Now McConnell
is Senate majority leader -- and he claims his hands are tied.


McConnell's spokesman at the National Republican Senatorial
Committee, Brad Dayspring, predicted that Obama's amnesty threat would
drive voters to "elect a new Senate (that) will stand up to the
president."


Check! Mission accomplished! Done and done! Officially off our
bucket list. OK, guys, your turn. When do you start standing up to the
president? Hello? Hell-oooo?


To gin up votes, "Republican insiders" told the Washington
Examiner last fall that "the results of the midterm elections" would
determine how "aggressive" the GOP would be in fighting Obama's amnesty.


Voters gave you a blow-out victory, Republicans. You cleaned
their clocks. (Have you seen Harry Reid lately?) Where's that promised
aggression on amnesty?


Republicans and George Will tell us they can't stand up to Obama's executive amnesty because the media are unfair.


Oh, well, in that case ... never mind.


This is news to them? They didn't know the media were unfair
when they were promising to block Obama's illegal amnesty before the
elections? The media have blamed the GOP for every failure of
Republicans and Democrats to reach an agreement since the Hoover
administration. This isn't a surprise development.


Why don't Republicans attack the media? People hate the media!
Their power is eroding -- and it would erode a lot faster if Congress
would challenge them. Instead of submitting to the media's blackmail, my
suggestion is, take their gun away.


Tell voters what the media won't: that Obama's "amnesty" will
give illegal aliens Social Security cards and three years of
back-payments through the Earned Income Tax Credit, even though they
never paid taxes in the first place.


Could we get a poll on that: Should the government issue work
permits to illegal aliens and give them each $25,000 in U.S. taxpayer
money? I promise you, Obama would lose that vote by at least 80-20. Even
people vaguely supportive of not hounding illegal aliens out of the
country didn't sign up to open the U.S. Treasury to them.


Tell voters that the media are refusing to report that, for the
past two weeks, Senate Democrats have been filibustering a bill that
would defund Obama's illegal amnesty.


Whether or not the Democrats continue to filibuster the bill
containing the amnesty defund, the government won't shut down --
contrary to hysterical claims by the media and George Will. The
government is funded. Only the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
will be "defunded."


Which means, wait ... I'm counting on my fingers ... yes, that's right: NOTHING.


Nearly all DHS employees are "essential" personnel required to
stay on the job even if the department is defunded -- the Secret
Service, the Transportation Security Administration, the Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Customs and Border Protection and the Coast
Guard.


Approximately 200,000 of DHS's 230,000 employees will keep working.


By "government shutdown," the media mean: "some secretaries will not go to work."


Why don't Republicans spend all their airtime attacking the
media for lying about what Obama's amnesty does and what the Democrats
are doing? It's hard to avoid concluding that Republicans aren't trying
to make the right arguments. In fact, it kind of looks like they're
intentionally throwing the fight on amnesty.


If a Republican majority in both houses of Congress can't stop
Obama from issuing illegal immigrants Social Security cards and years of
back welfare payments, there is no reason to vote Republican ever
again.




Saturday, February 14, 2015

Plan for massive Valentine’s Day shooting in Halifax foiled | Kajunman's Swamp


Valentine’s Day shooting plot in Halifax foiled by police, with three suspects arrested and a fourth found dead (VIDEO)

Canadian police on Friday arrested three suspects,
and found a fourth dead, for a plot to open fire in a public venue on
Valentine’s Day. Many details about the plan and its suspects are still
being withheld, but police said it was not intended as a terrorist
attack.

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Friday, February 13, 2015, 11:03 PM

Police said one of the suspects, a 19-year-old man, was found dead in this home in Timberlea, a suburb of Halifax. Global News Police said one of the suspects, a 19-year-old man, was found dead in this home in Timberlea, a suburb of Halifax.

A disturbing mass murder plot planned for Valentine’s Day in Halifax,
Nova Scotia, was foiled by Canadian police, authorites said.


Three of the young suspects in the sick scheme, one of whom is
American, were arrested Friday, and another was found dead. Police were
tipped off to the plan earlier in the week.


Police said at least two of the suspects were planning to enter a
mall “with a goal of opening fire to kill citizens, and then
themselves,” CBC reported.


The plan was the brainchild of a 19-year old man from Timberlea, a
Halifax suburb, and a woman, 23, from Geneva, Ill., both of whom had
access to firearms, according to police.


The Timberlea man was found dead from a gunshot wound in his family
house after police surrounded the home and tried talking to him.


Brian Brennan, commanding officer of the Nova Scotia Royal Canadian Mounted Police, said the foiled plan was not intended as a terrorist attack. Global News Brian
Brennan, commanding officer of the Nova Scotia Royal Canadian Mounted
Police, said the foiled plan was not intended as a terrorist attack.

The woman was arrested early Friday morning after getting off a
flight from Chicago to Halifax. She had prewritten several statements
she wanted to be tweeted after her suicide.


Two Halifax men, aged 17 and 20, were also arrested, but their roles in the plan have yet to be determined.


The names of the suspects and information about their connections to each other have not been released.


Brian Brennan, commanding officer of the Nova Scotia Royal Canadian
Mounted Police, said “there’s nothing in the investigation to classify
it as a terrorist attack.” He said it appeared to be a violent way for
the suspects to express “some beliefs” they shared, but he did not
elaborate. Police said the suspects seemed obsessed with death and
collected photos of mass killings.



Brennan said police believe there are no other suspects in the thwarted Valentine’s Day massacre.

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

IS ANYBODY SURPRISED? NORWAY DEPORTS MUSLIMS, CRIME RATE DROPS 31%

IS ANYBODY SURPRISED? NORWAY DEPORTS MUSLIMS, CRIME RATE DROPS 31%



Posted by








Oslo, Norway: "The world's
largest gang of  thugs, murderers, and rapists is masquerading as a
religion of peace," says Adrian Stavig, a resident of Oslo.



Beginning this past January, the new Norwegian Prime Minister, Erna
Solberg began a program which targets and deports Muslims who have ties
to radical groups. 




While many in America would say this is racist, it's worked in dramatic
fashion. Violent crimes are down more than 31% in Norway.











What a shocker.



Perhaps the rest of Europe and
the United States could learn a lesson or two about radical Islam here.
Deport the radicals, keep the moderates, and everybody wins.



From Oslo local news:




A record number of people were deported by Norwegian authorities in October, said government sources.





The National Police Immigration Service Norway (Politiets
Utlendingsenhet – PU) deported 824 people in October, which is a new
record.



The previous record was set in September, the month prior, when 763 people were deported, reported Dagsavisen.


PU believe some of the reasons for the rise in figures are more
resources, more staff and a change of “portfolio priorities”. It has
also become easier for Norwegian authorities to deport people back to Afghanistan and Nigeria.



Kristin Kvigne, head of PU, said to Dagsavisen: “This month helps us reach our goal for this year.”


Norway’s government has ruled that 7,100 people will be deported in
2014. At the end of October, PU had deported 5,876 people so far this
year.



A percentage of those deported in 2014 were asylum seekers who had
their application for continued asylum rejected. They were then deported
along with their families. The majority of deportees, however, had
committed crimes, or had returned illegally to Norway after being
deported.



Kvigne
said it was important to view the high number of deportations made by
PU in the context of falling crime rates across the country.



Not everybody in Norway is happy with the increased deportations. One academic slammed the new policies:



“Norwegian women must take responsibility for the fact that
Muslim men find their manner of dress provocative. And since these men
believe women are responsible for rape, the women must adapt to the
multicultural society around them.”
 
– Dr. Unni Wikan, Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo





So, Dr Wikan, using your logic, it is the victim's fault they have been
raped? Not in this universe. You sir may have book smarts, but you sure
don't have any common sense.




And there you have it! Kicking out radical Muslims makes a nation safer
and peaceable. Women can walk around without fear of being raped,
people just get along a lot better.


 


Blog: Muslim leaders to hold 'Stand with the Prophet' conference in Texas this weekend

Blog: Muslim leaders to hold 'Stand with the Prophet' conference in Texas this weekend



Muslim leaders to hold 'Stand with the Prophet' conference in Texas this weekend



To
combat Islam's poor PR recently, Muslim leaders from across America
will hold a "Stand With the Prophet in Honor and Respect" conference in
Dallas on Saturday.  The forum will try to counter what they call
"Islamophobes" in America who have spread hate toward Muslims around the
world.




Get a load of the lineup of speakers.



Washington Free Beacon:



Organizers
of the event place the blame for Islam’s bad reputation on the media
and so-called American Islamophobes who have “invested at least $160
million dollars to attack our Prophet and Islam,” according to the conference web page.




Keynote
speakers at the event will include Georgetown University professor John
Esposito, founding director of the school’s Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal
Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, which has come under fire
for, among other things, hosting 9/11 Truthers and a member of Egypt’s Nazi Party.




Also scheduled to attend the forum is controversial New York-based Imam Siraj Wahhaj, who was an “unindicted co-conspirator
in the 1993 World Trade Center bombings trial. Wahhaj has called the
FBI and CIA the “real terrorists” and expressed a desire for all
Americans to become Muslim, according to the New York Post.




Organizers
of the conference claim that the media and Islamophobes in America are
the main reason why Islam and its prophet have such a bad reputation in
the Western world.




“This
is not an event. It is the beginning of a movement,” organizers write
on their website, which blames Americans for giving Islam a bad name. “A
movement to defend Prophet Muhammad, his person, and his message.”




“All
these accusations were invented by Islamophobes in America,” the group
claims. “As we celebrate the Prophet in our now annual, nationwide
event: Stand with the Prophet, we recommit ourselves to rectify his
image, peace be upon him.”




The event seeks to capitalize on outrage over cartoons and other materials mocking Mohammed in popular culture.



“Frustrated
with Islamophobes defaming the Prophet?” the event materials ask.
“Fuming over extremists like ISIS who give a bad name to Islam? Remember
the Danish cartoons defaming the Prophet? Or the anti-Islam film,
‘Innocence of Muslims’?”



I think I'll pass.



When
"defaming the prophet" can mean just about anything, they're going to
be very busy getting outraged over "Islamophobes" who make jokes about
Mohammed, or put his image on a toilet seat, or perhaps simply speak
about him without the reverence and worship of some Muslims.  For any of
those transgressions, you can lose your head.




"Islamophobes" indeed.



They
may condemn ISIS, but what will be said about the Paris terrorist
attacks?  Given the tone of the conference, it wouldn't surprise me if
the terrorists weren't excused of their murders and perhaps justify
their actions with weasel words about Islam being a "religion of
peace."  It's become SOP for these "good Muslims" to dance around the
terrorist question and not face the fact that many in their midst turn
their outrage at insults to the prophet into murderous intent.
 




Ex-Muslim’s Open Letter to America: “What else has to happen so you wake up?”

Ex-Muslim’s Open Letter to America: “What else has to happen so you wake up?”



Ex-Muslim’s Open Letter to America: “What else has to happen so you wake up?”

Mark ChristianMark Christian is the President and Executive Director of the Global Faith Institute.
He is the son and nephew of high ranking leaders of the Muslim
Brotherhood in his home country of Egypt. He is working in Nebraska
against Muslim Brotherhood front groups’ malicious plans within the “Tri-Faith Initiative” in Omaha — details here.


“Ex-Muslim’s Open Letter To America: ‘WHAT ELSE HAS TO HAPPEN SO YOU WAKE UP?!,’ by Prissy Holly, Mad World News, January 11, 2015:


Meet Mark Christian, a brave man who has dedicated his life to exposing what Islam truly is all about.


After leaving Islam a decade ago to convert to Christianity, Mark
pulls no punches when speaking out about his former religion, frequently
calling out the Muslims who choose to murder in the name of their god.


“A god who is insecure enough to be offended by a
cartoon, and incompetent to the level that he wants you to avenge for
him, is not a god worthy of worship, but a devil who is leading you to
your demise.


“When people challenged Jesus, he made them walk on water, raised
them from the dead, and healed their sickness to prove ‘who He Is’ … But
when people challenged Mohamed, he chopped their heads off to prove his
power as a prophet … Well you chop my head off as much as you want. My
heart will continue to call on the name of my savior Jesus Christ.


“Where is the American spirit and the American soul? Where are those
who destroyed Hitler and brought down the Berlin Wall? When planes flew
into your buildings, knifes ran through your fellow citizens’ throats,
bombs went off in your Boston streets, Women and kids are screaming in
every country around the world. All of this and you are still calling
Islam the religion of peace … What else needs to happen for that Giant
to wake up, and liberate humanity from the bondage and the fear of
Islam???”
The following is an open letter from Mark, not just to
Americans, but to those professing to be “peaceful” Muslims. In the
light of the recent terror attacks in Paris, this message needs to be
heeded and applied before it is too late!


The circumstances we face are dire and we have no
coherent way of addressing it until we establish the stark, bright line
between Muslims who are willing to respect the religious liberty of
others (which must absolutely require the abandonment of vengeance over
insults, perceived or real) and those who count us as so many cattle,
ripe for slaughter and easily led.


Our society can no longer afford to self-censor when it comes to the
“hair trigger” that is Islam.  Muslims of the former type I described
above may be offended, and for this I am sympathetic; but Muslims of the
latter type will become enraged and will reveal to all the depth of
their incompatibility with civilized society. This is my aim: to force
these Muslims to expose their unacceptable radicalism for all to see,
but also to reach a self-realization of the depravity of that radicalism
that exists within themselves.


Being offended is uncomfortable for sure, but it is nothing compared
to being hunted and subjugated, which is the lot our Christian brothers
and sisters in Muslim-dominated lands endure, and as we saw in Paris;
and increasingly in our own western democracies. The source of this is a
foolish adherence to the idea of “multiculturalism,” enforced by a
misguided political correctness.  I believe you would heartily agree
that there is no verbal insult, nor cartoon that would move you to
murder.  However, hundreds of millions of Muslims worldwide disagree.


Part of the effort of the Global Faith Institute is
to expose the reality of these twisted beliefs, not just among the
jihadists (who we all know believe this) but more importantly, among the
so-called “moderate” Muslims.


The concept of killing over an insult is abhorrent, but is held to be
acceptable by a majority of Muslims.  Does this mean that a majority of
Muslims would kill over a cartoon? Of course not.  However it does mean
that a majority of Muslims would NOT stop a fellow Muslim from doing
so, and might even feel compelled to assist or support them either
financially, or through their silence. This concept is the bridge from
religion to savagery. If a Muslim accepts insult as justification for
violence, then it becomes possible  for them to move to the next stage –
honor killings, murder of apostates and infidels, etc.


Think of responding to insult with violence as the “gateway drug” to
all the evils that animate Islam today.  Break that link, and the rest
will collapse for lack of support.


We are at the point where the lack of a stark, bright line is
enabling death.  I must do all I can to draw that line, and force
Muslims to choose which side of that line they prefer. This is an
essential first step in exposing the radicalism that we both know
festers beneath the surface of many Muslims; even some of whom we call
friends.


Some of those “peaceful” Muslims are of the opinion that HAMAS is
doing nothing wrong by targeting civilians. They say are merely “acting
as anyone would toward an oppressor.” Their words, not mine.


We are in a war, declared by Islam against civilization itself.  As
war is not pretty, sometimes tactics within a battle are difficult as
well.  I have the greatest love for Muslims, as they are in fact the
first victims of Islam, and it is that love that leads me to force them
to address their own need for religious reform.  When one allows a
wayward son to sit at the Thanksgiving table while drunk and on drugs,
one is enabling that behavior.  Real love tells that son to be sober and
clean before entering this house.  The son will resist, but only
through that conflict can the problem be resolved.  So it is with Islam,
and those who follow it.
Mark is the founder of Global Faith Institute, whose mission is “To
inspire the lost with the hope of Christ; to equip America with
knowledge of the truth, greater than the evils of the age; to embrace
the role of “Watchmen,” that we might sound an alarm for all who will
listen.”  
Be sure and follow him on Facebook and on Twitter.


If you would like to read the exclusive interview Mark did recently with Mad World News, you can check that out here.
 




Monday, January 12, 2015

Brock to Murdoch: Your Network Must Take A Stand

Brock to Murdoch: Your Network Must Take A Stand | Press/Bloggers | Media Matters for America



Brock to Murdoch: Your Network Must Take A Stand

January 10, 2011 1:16 PM EST MEDIA MATTERS STAFF
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monday, January 10, 2011
CONTACT

Jess Levin (202) 772-8162

jlevin@mediamatters.org
Media Matters CEO calls for Beck, Palin to be reined in after AZ shooting

Washington, DC -- Today, in response to the tragic shooting in Arizona and the increasing focus on the tone of political discourse, Media Matters for America
founder and CEO David Brock issued an open letter to News Corp. CEO
Rupert Murdoch asking him to rein in Fox News personalities Glenn Beck
and Sarah Palin, both of whom frequently use violent and revolutionary
rhetoric.

The letter reads:

Dear Mr. Murdoch,

Since
the early days of 2009, I have warned your network and others in the
media about the very real dangers of extreme anti-government rhetoric
and the stoking of fear.

I cautioned against Glenn Beck's
proclamation that he was a "progressive hunter" and his statement that
the government was full of vampires before he instructed his viewers to
"drive a stake through the heart of the bloodsuckers." And against Palin
revealing her 2010 "targets" with a map showing gun sights over 20
congressional districts, including that of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords,
urging followers to not "Retreat, Instead -- RELOAD." I said on national
television that inducing fear, anger, and the use of violent imagery
creates a climate of fear, suspicion, and paranoia that could lead to
another Oklahoma City.

I hoped my warnings would be heeded. Instead, they were cast aside.
Even
after evidence emerged in October that California gunman Byron Williams
was inspired by Beck to attempt to assassinate progressive leaders and I
pleaded for Palin to set an example by condemning her Fox colleague's
violent and revolutionary rhetoric, Fox did nothing to address the
situation.

On Beck's radio show, he and Palin jovially mocked
my concern. For seven minutes on air, the pair joked about my plea to
tone down the rhetoric. Beck said it was "laughable," "sad," and
compared me to the "smelly kid in third grade." Palin giggled and said I
was "silly" and that my argument was "pathetic" and "desperate" before
ultimately concluding, "I stand with you, Glenn."

Beck and Palin
are two of Fox's most recognizable figures. Before this heartbreaking
tragedy in Arizona, you were either unwilling or unable to rein in their
violent rhetoric. But now, in the wake of the killings, your network
must take a stand. (I thought it did.  It did the best thing it could do.  Supports the Second Amendment.)

You have the power to order them to stop
using violent rhetoric, on and off of Fox's air. If they fail to do so,
it is incumbent upon you to fire them or be responsible for the climate
they create and any consequences thereof.

My previous warnings were laughed off and ignored. For the country's sake, I hope you take them more seriously now.

Sincerely,

David Brock

Founder and CEO, Media Matters for America
 




Thursday, January 8, 2015

Malia Obama Pimps Vile Rap Group

Malia Obama Pimps Vile Rap Group; Smearing Women w/ Feces, Killing Cops

By Debbie Schlussel


Malia Obama is pimping a vile rap group, one of whose members goes by
the name of a gross sex act involving the anal canal and human waste.
The group, “Pro Era,” has a repertoire of “songs” filled with the
N-word, explicit sexual reference, and talk about killing police, raping
women, and other violence–you know, all the stuff for which they
apparently marched on Selma. Yup, the First Daughter is pimping this
crap . . . FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.


maliaobamaproera
For all their pretense at protecting their teen girls and raising
them as polite, upstanding citizens, the Obamas really aren’t paying
attention. Or they’re just fake and phony. Not sure which. Either
way, they clearly failed. Today, First Daugher Malia Obama posted a
photo on her Instagram account (since deleted), which depicts her
promoting disgusting rap group, “Pro Era.” The picture was taken from
the White House residence, where she took a selfie of herself in a
T-shirt bearing the “rap collective’s” logo. I guess she had no prob
with the group’s professed aim of “slaughtering pigs” a/k/a cops.


Pro Era’s members include a rapper who goes by the name, “Dirty Sanchez,” the slang name for a gross sex act involving defiling women with feces. Here are some lyrics from “Come Come,” one of the “songs” by Pro Era, featuring Dirty Sanchez:


Now it’s a shame that I got to hunt you

Banging on my homie, you won’t need Russell

Young n-gga, Running up, snatch and hustle

It’s a BK n-gga, bouta strap the muscle . . . .

24/7 and never ends all ho

.44 let my lungs feel smoke . . . .

Dirty want his money right now

And his credit

I deserve my respect for this shit that I imbedded

I am better than them n-ggas who pretended that they them n-ggas

Who be lying to them n-ggas who be buying they shit so

F-ck the government word to my brother man

From the 5th Flo’

Won’t get fed if your mouth is closed

That’s something he told me

The 47 Og’s running it low key

I’m still Dirty and I’m still 7:30

My vision is still blurry so picture perfect ain’t really certain

Blind bitch baby, does the cover match them curtains? . . .

Can’t say my whole team eating yet

But I’m cooking up a mess

Where syringes were pressed: dirty kitchen

I’m spillin’ all my kids on her dress, Started living what I’m thinking

Decider, we next stop

Stop and then frisk

Slaughtering pigs anybody can get it

Shooting stars, now make a wish

Rocking skins like the skins we rocking

Powerpuff smoking on that blossom

We’re running the game and this shit is exhausting

But I don’t give a f-ck cause this shit is awesome
Hmmm . . . instead of tweeting phony Twitter pics of herself holding a
sign with the hastag “#BringBackourGirls,” maybe Michelle LaVaughn
Robinson Hussein Obama Idi Amin Dada should send herself a hashtag:
#BringBackYourOwnDaughter, woman.


The Obamas: they mistook America’s need for class in the White House for ass in the White House. Not the same thing.


Hey, remember when the Republican Congressional press secretary was
forced to resign over a tweet about the Obama girls’ lack of decorum?
Well, she was right.


A couple of exit questions for Malia Obama:


Did you answer when your favorite rap group rapped, “Blind bitch baby, does the cover match them curtains?”


When your favorite “rap collective,” “Pro Era” raps “F-ck the government,” aren’t they talking about your dad?


Maybe Malia Obama’s trying to tell us something about her dad. Uh, honey, we already know.


“Pro Era” = The “Obama Era.” Yup, the President Camacho thing from the movie, “Idiocracy,” wasn’t a stretch at all.


***


One last thing: I knew it as only a matter of time before members of
the First Family would become their own reality stars and demand
sponsorships. Malia Obama just did it more quickly than I imagined.
Her first endorsement is this vile rap group. Congrats, bimbo.




obamasmiling.jpg