Governor Jindal’s Oct 22, 2011 election endorsements

Jindal weighs in on Oct. 22 election - The Independent Weekly.

It’s some what strange to me just how Gov. Jindal went about picking who he would endorse for the Oct 22 election.  When it comes to the LA-06 District Senate race I do have a question or four for the Gov.

1. Did you speak to any of the candidates running for a  seat besides the candidate you endorsed?
2. Are you aware of just how your endorsed candidate stands on the side of Conservatives?
3. Why would I, or anyone else, feel as though you are paying back a favor to these endorsed candidates?
4. Some of these endorsed candidates are not Conservatives nor even Republicans but are RINOs who have switched from the Democrat Party for no other reason than to get (re)elected and will not work with you.  So exactly how do you justify that selection?

A case and point:  Congressman Mack 'Bodi' White has filled his term limited seat in the House of Representatives and is now seeking an office in the Senate.  While Rep. White seems to be a person of good standing a couple of things have been brought to light that makes Rep. White appear to be a typical career politician.  He claims to be a Conservative but yet some of the Bills he has written and tried to get passed into law are not Bills a true Conservative would make.

• The Internet Tax (fee) HB 569

Rep. White tried his hardest to get this tax (fee) passed into law but thankfully it was shot down.  AG 'Buddy' Caldwell and Rep White sat before the Senate Committee on Commerce and tried to pass this tax off as a 'fee'.  Knowing full well there is a Federal law that prohibits any taxing on the internet, still they pushed hard for their 'fee' to be applied.  A true Conservative would never do a thing like this.

17 June 2009

HB 569 internet access tax fee scam shot down by senate committee

HB 569 the bill by rino bodi white to tax internet access in louisiana was deferred by the senate committee on commerce, consumer protection and international affairs.

http://www.legis.state.la.us/billdata/byinst.asp?sessionid=09RS&billid=HB569&doctype=ALL

http://senate.legis.state.la.us/Commerce/Default.asp

link to the complete senate commerce committee hearing. length 01:59:54

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zwF9b5q5EQ

h/t to:

http://wesawthat.blogspot.com/2009/06/hb-569-internet-access-tax-fee-scam.html [emphasis mine]

The Governor had said he would veto any tax bill that came to his desk and yet he endorses Rep White, who with the assistance of the AG, tried to get this tax on the books by calling it a 'fee'.  Both of these men are endorsed by Gov. Jindal.  Conservative?? I think not!

So while the Governor endorses RINOs he never speaks to any other candidate.

Mr. Mike Mannino (R) is running against Rep. White (R) for the Senate seat for the LA-06 District.  Mr. Mannino said that the Governor has never spoken to him about this race.  Mr. Mannino is a true Conservative who believes in smaller government, less/no taxes, Pro-Life, and other conservative ideas and beliefs.  A man who will serve the people instead of himself.  A person who the Governor might find to be a good ally when a true Conservative is needed.  And yet the Governor has never spoken to Mr. Mannino.  How amazing!!

Here are the people Gov. Jindal has endorsed for the election of Oct. 22, 2011:

Gov. Jindal’s endorsements in statewide races:

Insurance Commissioner: Jim Donelon
Commissioner of Agriculture: Mike Strain
Attorney General: Buddy Caldwell
Treasurer: John Kennedy

Gov. Jindal’s endorsements in BESE races:

BESE District 1    James Garvey
BESE District 3    Glenny Lee Buquet
BESE District 4    Walter Lee
BESE District 5    Jay Guillot
BESE District 6    Chas Roemer
BESE District 7    Holly Boffy

Gov. Jindal’s endorsements for Senate:

SD01    AG Crowe
SD06    Bodi White
SD07    David Heitmeier
SD08    John A.  Alario, Jr.
SD09    Conrad Appel
SD10    Daniel “Danny” Martiny
SD11    Jack Donahue
SD15    Sharon Weston Broome
SD16    Dan Claitor
SD17    Rick Ward III
SD18    “Jody” Amedee
SD19    Garrett Monti
SD20    Norby Chabert
SD22    Fred Mills
SD23    Patrick Page Cortez
SD25    Dan “Blade” Morrish
SD26    Jonathan Perry
SD27    Ronnie Johns
SD28    Paul “Doc” Miller
SD29    Rick Gallot
SD30    John Smith
SD31    Gerald Long
SD32    Neil Riser
SD33    Mike Walsworth
SD34    Francis Thompson
SD35    Bob Kostelka
SD37    Jane Smith

Gov. Jindal’s endorsements for House:

HD01    James Morris
HD04    Patrick Williams
HD05    Alan Seabaugh
HD06    Thomas Carmody
HD07    Richard T. Burford
HD09    Henry L. Burns
HD13    James R. Fannin
HD14    Samuel P. Little
HD15    Frank A. Hoffmann
HD18    Major Thibaut
HD19    Charles R. “Bubba” Chaney
HD20    Steve Pylant
HD21    John F. “Andy” Anders
HD22    Billy R. Chandler
HD24    Frank A. Howard
HD28    Kirby Roy III
HD31    Nancy Landry
HD33    Michael E Danahay
HD35    Brett F. Geymann
HD36    Chuck Kleckley
HD37    John E. Guinn
HD38    Julie Harrington
HD39    Don Menard
HD40    Ledricka Thierry
HD41    Mickey J. Guillory
HD43    Stuart Bishop
HD44    Ricky Hardy
HD45    Joel C. Robideaux
HD46    Mike Huval
HD47    Bob Hensgens
HD48    Taylor F. Barras
HD49    Simone B. Champagne
HD51    Joe Harrison
HD52    Gordon Dove
HD56    Greg Miller
HD59    Eddie J. Lambert
HD60    Karen St. Germain
HD65    Clifton R. Richardson
HD66    Hunter Greene
HD68    Stephen F. Carter
HD69    Erich E. Ponti
HD70    Franklin J. Foil
HD71    J. Rogers Pope
HD73    Stephen E. Pugh
HD74    Scott M. Simon
HD76    J. Kevin Pearson
HD77    John M. Schroder
HD78    Kirk Talbot
HD79    Anthony V. “Tony” Ligi
HD80    Joseph P. Lopinto
HD82    Cameron Henry
HD84    Patrick Connick
HD86    Chris Broadwater
HD87    Girod Jackson III
HD88    Johnny Berthelot
HD89    Timothy Burns
HD90    “Greg” Cromer
HD91    Walt Leger III
HD92    Thomas P. Willmott
HD93    Helena Moreno
HD95    Sherman Mack
HD97    Jared Brossett
HD98    Fenn French
HD100  Austin Badon
HD101  Harold Williams

Technorati Tags: Gov Jindal,endorsements,election Oct 22,2011

CERN claims faster-than-light particle measured

CERN claims faster-than-light particle measured | WBRZ News 2 Louisiana : Baton Rouge, LA |

 

GENEVA - Scientists at the world's largest physics lab say they have clocked subatomic particles traveling faster than light.

If that's true, it would break - if not severely twist - a fundamental pillar of physics.

Nothing is supposed to go faster than light.

But scientists say that neutrinos - one of the strangest well-known particles in physics - smashed past the cosmic speed barrier of 186,282 miles per second.

The European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN, says the speeds were detected in a neutrino beam fired from Geneva to a lab 454 miles away in Italy.

Baffled scientists are asking others to independently verify the measurements or find other more mundane explanations for the measured speed.

I personally cannot imagine how fast this is.  When you start breaking this down into 'real' time it looks something like this:

186,282mps = time a neutrinos travels in a second

186,282mps X 60 seconds = 11,176,920mpminute

11,176,920mpm X 60 minutes = 670,615,200mphour

670,615,200mph X 24hours = 16,094,764,800mpday

16,094,764,800mpd X 365days = 5,874,589,152,000mpyear

THE SPEED OF LIGHT

 In our every day lives light seems to travel from one place to another instantaneously. When we flip on the light in a room there is no delay between when we first see the bulb start glowing and when light illuminates the far corners of the chamber. Our nervous systems are much too slow to notice the rays of light that appear from the bulb and move like a wave washing over the room. 

Light travels at a speed of 186,000 miles a second or 700 million miles an hour. For scale, the distance from the Earth to the Moon is about 239,000 miles. This seems pretty fast and indeed theory says that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, (until today, 9-23-2011 {emphasis mine}).

When we deal with the immense distances of space, though, even light seems slow. When astronauts were on the Moon it took over a second for the radio waves (which travel at the speed of light) carrying their voices to reach us. Light coming from the sun takes eight and one half minutes to hit Earth. (This means that if the sun were suddenly to go dark, it would take over eight minute for us to notice) Light from the nearest stars, other than the sun, takes four and a half years to get here. From the farthest stars in distant galaxies it can take billions of years for the light to arrive..

The distance light can travel in a year is called a "light year." The light year is one of the basic measures of distance for astronomy.

Here's a picture that gives some idea of how LIGHT travels, in regards to time, from various points in out Solar System:

http://www.unmuseum.org/speed.htm

Related articles, courtesy of Zemanta:

• Can Neutrinos Travel Faster Than Light?
• Faster-than-light Neutrinos could undermine Einstein
• Claims of faster-than-light neutrinos announced
• Faster-than-light travel discovered? Slow down, folks
• Scientists Find That Neutrinos Move Faster Than Light
• Neutrinos Travel Faster Than Light, According to One Experiment at CERN

Make that two fights involving LSU football players

Make that two fights involving LSU football players | The Advertiser | theadvertiser.com

BATON ROUGE – A fight involving two LSU football players outside the West Campus Apartments on June 5 is just now coming to light while a police investigation of a Aug. 19 fight continues to unravel, but the players in the earlier fracas were not the aggressors, according to LSU Police.

Marcus Adams, 22, and Robert Davis, 31, were arrested in early June and booked into East Baton Rouge Parish prison on charges of simple battery, aggravated assault with a firearm, illegal use of a weapon and carrying a firearm on school property.

Adams allegedly pointed a gun at LSU defensive end Sam Montgomery, who had been arguing and fighting with him on the apartment grounds at 2:30 a.m. June 5, according to LSU Police. Adams also allegedly pointed a gun at LSU quarterback Zach Mettenberger, who saw the fight and yelled at Adams to calm down, according to LSU Police.

Montgomery said he “pleaded for his life,” when the gun was on him, the LSU Police report said.

Several LSU football players have been interviewed about the incident in addition to Montgomery and Mettenberger, but none have been arrested. West Campus Apartments is the home of many football players and other LSU athletes.

East Baton Rouge Parish district attorney Hillar Moore III is expected to file charges against Adams and Davis soon as the case proceeds to the court process.

How Did Obama Obtain a Social Security Number from Connecticut?

How Did Obama Obtain a Social Security Number from Connecticut?| The Post & Email

A BLOGGER’S PERSPECTIVE
by Dwight Kehoe, blogging at TPATH
(Aug. 24, 2011) — Susan Daniels, a private investigator with almost 2 decades of experience has come to a very compelling conclusion – President Obama is using a Social Security number, issued to someone else. This is, as is the forgery of public documents, a crime.
The SS number Obama is illegally using will not be posted here, but it can be found easily enough if one wishes to verify these facts.
From the age of 15 to 25, there is no record of Obama using any Social Security number. While in school in Hawaii he may well have been able to get by without one. However, once he moved to California and began university schooling in Occidental College, he would need to provide one.
Conveniently, all of his college records have been sealed, so there is no way of knowing, at least for now, what SS number he used at that time. It is possible that the number he used may be at the heart of why he needed a new one. Maybe he was issued a foreign student SS number along with monetary aid for schooling. Not knowing the real reason, this of course is just the speculation of this writer, me. At this point only Obama knows why.
What is known, is that the SS number Obama is now using, does not show up on any data base as being used by anyone, until 1986 even though Social Security records show it was issued in the last two weeks of March, 1977. The number was issued to a person born in 1890 who apparently applied for it at age 87.
In 1935 when the Social Security System began, many people never applied because it was voluntary. This person most likely needed to get one very late in life in order to get some benefit or other. The number never shows up in data bases, so the person must have passed on very shortly after being assigned the number. This would make this number, a perfect candidate for criminal activity relating to false ID’s.
Enter Bill Ayers, the communist, revolutionary, terrorist that Obama claimed was just some guy living in his neighborhood, who’s children went to school with his, even though Ayers’ children are a half generation older than Obama’s. Later it was discovered that Bill Ayers, more than likely, wrote much of Obama’s book,’ Dreams From My Father’, as well as holding one of the first Obama fundraisers in his home.
Ayers has said, and proudly so, that a lot of what they did as terrorist bombers and murderers, was producing and falsifying identifications for their criminal activities. The most effective method was through the use of fraudulent Social Security numbers. A minimally used SS number issued to an 87 year old would some how seem to be a great candidate for that illegal SS number file.
Even though Ayers was just a “guy in the neighborhood,” if Obama needed to dump his legal SS number, for whatever reason, Professor Ayers may have taken a break from indoctrinating our youth and reached into his false ID vault and issued him one.
A few final facts about Social Security numbers. 1. No SS number is ever reused, even after the death of the user. 2. SS numbers are issued by state location. One must live in the state where it is issued. 3. Obama’s natural father, adopted father, mother or grand parents never lived in Connecticut. 4. When the SS number Obama is using was issued by Connecticut, Obama was 15 and living in Hawaii.
The question here is obvious. Is there no one one in Congress or the media with the backbone to stand up and ask, – What the heck is going on in my country?
Of course, there may well be a very honest and reasonable explanation for this, the forged birth certificate and the very suspicious Selective Service documents.
Someone has “a lot of splainin’ to do.” Will our Congress and media ever step up to the plate and demand it?
It’s looking very doubtful.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Hanoi Jane Fonda

Hanoi Jane Fonda

WTG QVC!!!

No we will NOT FORGET that you are a TRAITOR to this great Country, 'Hanoi' Jane Fonda.

B-b-b-But It's HIS Fault

B-b-b-But It's HIS Fault 

The  Washington  Post babbled again today about Obama inheriting a huge deficit from Bush. Amazingly enough, a lot of people swallow this BULL. 

So once more, a short civics lesson. 

Budgets do not come from the White House.  They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democratic Party. 
Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for FY 2008 & FY 2009 as well as FY 2010 & FY 2011. 
In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases. 

For FY 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office.  At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the FY 2009 budgets. 
And where was Barack Obama during this time?  He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete FY 2009.  Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period:    (below)

 If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the FY 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending.  After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.

If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself. 
In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.

White House Payroll

It's amazing the waste of our tax dollars in this spreed sheet offering.  No wonder our finances are in such disarray.  I dare say anyone knows just how many people are on the pay roll.  Once you start adding in the staffers for the Senators and Representaives and the Supreme Justices and all the other 'official offices' employment is just another desk in someone's office corner.

I guess the one that really sets me off the most is the people managing the affairs of the First Lady.  Check this out:

Schake, Kristina K.
Special assistant to the president and director of communications for the first lady
$114,000

Winter, Melissa E.
Special assistant to the president and deputy chief of staff and director of operations for the first lady
$120,000

Jarvis, Kristen
Special assistant for scheduling and traveling aide to the first lady
$60,000

Jones, Kristin T.
Special assistant and personal aide to the first lady
$50,000

August, Hannah M.
Press secretary to the first lady
$70,000

Lee, Stephanie A.
Executive assistant to the chief of staff to the first lady
$45,000

Starkey, Frances M.
Director of scheduling and advance for the first lady
$90,000

Ledbetter, Howli J.
Director of correspondence for the first lady
$50,000

Cleland, Jeannette M.
Deputy director of scheduling and events coordinator for the first lady
$66,300

Sanders, Trooper
Deputy director of policy and projects for the first lady
$85,000

Fitts, Alan O.
Deputy director of advance and trip director for the first lady
$66,300

Vrazilek, Lauren S.
Deputy associate director of correspondence for the first lady
$42,000

Frye, Jocelyn C.
Deputy assistant to the president and director of policy and projects for the first lady
$140,000

Tchen, Christina M.
Assistant to the president and chief of staff to the first lady
$172,200

For a GRAND TOTAL of a mere $1,170,800.00 for ONE YEAR
And in case you don't have a calculator handy, that will be $4,683,200 for ONE (4 year) TERM
Of course this doesn't include any expenses that might be included for their 'jobs'.

You can see the whole thing here:

http://spreadsheets.latimes.com/white-house-salaries/

From looking at the spreadsheet it's no wonder he has all kinds of time to play golf.  Lots of other people are running the White House.

Obama’s Economists: Each Job ‘Saved or Created’ by the Stimulus Cost $278,000 (So Far)

Michelle Malkin » Obama’s Economists: Each Job ‘Saved or Created’ by the Stimulus Cost $278,000 (So Far)

As Jeffrey Anderson at the Weekly Standard pointed out, the White House releasing a fiscal report on the Friday before a long holiday weekend can only mean one thing: There’s not much good news in it for the White House, and, ergo, taxpayers.

Such is the case with the White House Council of Economic Advisors’seventh quarterly report on the impact of the “stimulus”:

The council reports that, using “mainstream estimates of economic multipliers for the effects of fiscal stimulus” (which it describes as a “natural way to estimate the effects of” the legislation), the “stimulus” has added or saved just under 2.4 million jobs — whether private or public — at a cost (to date) of $666 billion. That’s a cost to taxpayers of $278,000 per job.

In other words, the government could simply have cut a $100,000 check to everyone whose employment was allegedly made possible by the “stimulus,” and taxpayers would have come out $427 billion ahead.

Mind you these are Obama’s own economists, so the report is like an employee’s performance evaluation that was filled out by the employee. The absolute truth is probably much more bleak.

Over ten years, the CBO says the stimulus will raise the federal deficit $830 billion — $43 billion more than originally estimated.

Which brings us to President Obama’s weekly address:

Now, it would be nice if we could keep every tax break, but we can’t afford them. Because if we choose to keep those tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, or for hedge fund managers and corporate jet owners, or for oil and gas companies pulling in huge profits without our help — then we’ll have to make even deeper cuts somewhere else. We’ve got to say to a student, ‘You don’t get a college scholarship.’ We have to say to a medical researcher, ‘You can’t do that cancer research.’ We might have to tell seniors, ‘You have to pay more for Medicare.’

Or how about we say to the White House, “You don’t get to spend the remaining $164 billion earmarked for a ‘stimulus’ that is clearly a failure.”

To steal a line from a military recruiting campaign years ago, “it’s a great place to start” — but unfortunately the painfully obvious options never seem to be on the table.

Biden to Union Members: If You Vote Republican, Don't Ask Me For Any Help - FoxNews.com

Biden to Union Members: If You Vote Republican, Don't Ask Me For Any Help - FoxNews.com

Vice President Joe Biden acknowledged it wasn't a political event, but it still didn't prevent him from sending this warning to Teamsters union members during his address at their annual convention in Las Vegas this past Friday.

"And don't any of you, by the way, any of you guys vote Republican," Biden said. "I'm not supposed to say, this isn't political. ...don't come to me if you do! You're on your own, Jack!"

Biden provided the closing address at the 28th Annual International Brotherhood of Teamsters Convention at the Paris Hotel on Friday. The Vice President, who is known for his straightforward style, didn't hide his feelings about the current labor union fights across the country. He believes they are under attack by his Republican rivals for no apparent reason.

"Look at Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana, Missouri, Iowa, Florida, Pennsylvania. Did you ever think in 2011 you would be fighting for the right to work for less again?," said Biden. "What in God's name did any organized labor union do to the collapse of this economy? ... [I]t's bizarre, but that's the case they're making."

Republican governors in several states have sought to curb Union power in an effort to balance their state's budgets.

Biden also jokingly took a jab at the GOP, suggesting they change their logo.

"Jimmy," said Biden, referring to Teamsters Union president James R. Hoffa, "your (the Teamsters Union) logo is the horse's head. Their (GOP) logo should be the other horse's end."

But when it came to discussing the importance of keeping collective bargaining for labor unions, Biden was in no laughing matter.

"In their vision, you have no place at all. With our vision, you are the place!" said Biden. "We stand with you, organized labor, because with you we will restore the American dream."

Biden's next trip will be to Chicago on Sunday, where he'll deliver a speech at the National Education Association's annual meeting.

============================

Did anyone tell Joe that the logo for the Democrat Party, his Party, is the Donkey/Ass?

Ass: animal resembling horse with long ears: an animal resembling a small horse with long ears, sometimes used as a beast of burden. The donkey is a domesticated descendant of the wild ass.

And then there are some people who fit their Party's logo to a 'T'.

Landry Presides Over House, Blocks Recess Appointments

Landry Presides Over House, Blocks Recess Appointments - THE DEAD PELICAN 2011© Landry Presides Over House, Blocks Recess Appointments
July 01, 2011--5:31 PM CDT
WASHINGTON, DC - Continuing his efforts to prevent President Obama from making another recess appointment, Congressman Jeff Landry (R, LA-03) today presided over a pro forma session in the United States House of Representatives. After his service as Speaker Pro Tempore, Congressman Landry released the following statement:

This morning - under the instruction of Speaker Boehner, Leader Cantor, and Whip McCarthy - I presided over a pro forma session in the United States House of Representatives, preventing Congress from going into recess and blocking President Obama from issuing recess appointments.
Let me begin by saying that under normal circumstances, the House of Representatives should not involve itself nomination fights. The Founding Fathers clearly intended the Senate to handle the nominees through a vetting process. However, when liberal lobbyists, unions, and community organizers direct the White House to subvert the will of the Senate, extraordinary steps must be taken to return transparency to our government and sanity to our political appointees.
Recess appointments are intended to maintain the continuity of our government during periods when the Senate is not in session. They are for situations when nominees cannot be considered or confirmed, not for political expediency. This isn't 1852; Congress isn't out of session for 4 months at a time; it doesn't take a week for members to come back to Washington.
The last recess appointment President Obama made was Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board. Becker's nomination was rejected by the Senate. He is a man who argues that employers should have no say in union formations and who ruled that a private company could not relocate to a non-union state.
It is widely anticipated that the President will use a recess appointment to name Elizabeth Warren the head of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, soon-to-be one of the most powerful positions in the Federal government. This is very troubling considering Warren wants the government to approve every credit transaction that citizens enter into. If President Obama really wants to fill a position, he should make his nomination and send it to the Senate.
The American people sent a loud message last November that America needs to end Washington practices that are fundamentally wrong. They elected a strong group of conservative freshmen to return accountability to the American people. And they sent us to end the status quo in Washington. So to those who will argue that past presidents have also made recess appointments, I say the fact that Administrations have long abused the recess appointment process doesn't make it right.
That is why patriots like Representatives Tom Marino, Ben Quayle, Allen West, and 73 other freshmen have joined my efforts to hit the "kill switch" - a provision the Founding Fathers gave the House to utilize when the Senate's advice and consent is being circumvented by a hostile Administration. This kill switch comes in the form of adjournment resolutions.
Under Article 1, Section 5 of the Constitution, the House of Representatives can prevent the Senate from recessing by withholding its consent. Simply put: we do so by voting down, or not considering, a Senate adjournment resolution. And when we do so, we block the Administration's ability to make recess appointments.

My actions today are just the beginning. Representative Jeff Duncan will be in Washington on Tuesday, leaving his home district to ensure Congress stays in session. And Republican leaders will be here to ensure Congress does not recess for the rest of President Obama's term.

I applaud Speaker Boehner, Leader Cantor, and Whip McCarthy for their leadership and for their commitment to a transparent government - a government that belongs to We the People. I thank them for listening to our freshman coalition and taking the appropriate steps necessary to block President Obama from making recess appointments.

Recently, Congressman Landry led a coalition of 77 freshmen in a letter to House leadership requesting all appropriate measures be taken to prevent any recess appointment by the President for the remainder of the 112th Congress.

I have liked this man since he took office.  It seems everyday I read any new article about Rep Landry he is giving it his all to get America back to the way the Founding Father's wanted this Government to operate.  He's ridiculed by some, made fun of by others, called vulgar names by a few and still doesn't swerve from the path he is following.  Do I agree with him 100% on everything?  No.  But that is what makes us human.  There are a few Freshmen in the House of Reps that have taken their Oath and Allegiance to their job as s-e-r-i-o-u-s.  They see where this current President is leading this Country and they are trying to get us back on the correct route.  If only we had 400 members of this type in the House of Reps and 95 or so members in the Senate, we'd all ready be running on a four-lane highway instead of just trying to get back on a narrow path.
It's hard when you have to fight a bunch of Liberals that think all they have to do is raise taxes and then live the good life until the next tax vote comes around.
GEAUX REP LANDRY, GEAUX!!  Show those liberals that they can't scare a coonass from the Great State of Louisiana.  We got meaner alligators and snakes in our swamps than those lizards and snakes in D.C.

Muslim woman sues Abercrombie & Fitch over hijab

“Such a look policy cannot be squared with our shared values. No worker should have to choose between their religion and their job.”

Now that has to be one of the most foolish statements I’ve heard in a long time. ”No worker should have to choose between their religion and their job.” Are you serious??? Is there a more ignorant statement??? WOW!!!!

Being a Conservative Christian, if I wanted to work at a ‘Gentleman’s Club’ I would have to choose between my religion and the job. I don’t think what goes on in a ‘Gentleman’s Club’ is in accordance with God’s Word. And I DON’T have the RIGHT or FREEDOM to file a law suit trying to force the said club to change it’s business just so I can work their. There is a choice to be made but it’s not in whether I want to file a law suit or not. The choice is, do I give up my Christian beliefs/practices/principles to work there or do I find another job? And this is the same choice this Muslim lady has to make. Does she follow her religious beliefs or does she find another job? The choice seems fairly easy, to me. But then I’m just an old Hillbilly/Redneck/Cajun that relies on ‘common sense‘ and that ain’t something that seems to be in great use, in these days and times.

Now I ain’t no fan of Abercrombie & Fitch, matter of fact I can’t stand the company because of it’s advertising programs. They, for the most part, are nothing but filth, trash, garbage, demeaning, exploitative, and any other adjective you can add that goes along this line of thought.

One example of exploitation they use:

• http://abcnews.go.com/US/abercrombie-fitch-padded-bikini-top-for-7-year-olds.

What they are promoting with this type of advertising should not be tolerated by the public but we don’t need any ‘laws’ or ‘regulations’ to prohibit it. What should happen is a boycott of their stores and the loss of sales will convert into loss of profit, which in the long run will result in them dropping such programs or close the business.

But even with all of that, this woman, nor anyone else for that matter, has the right to tell the business how it will make it’s rules or write it’s employees handbook.

So if I’m on the jury, A&F are NOT GUILTY and this lady can pay legal expense and court cost. It’s just plain ridiculous and a waste of court time and she should serve some community service for wasting the court’s time. I mean she’s not employed so she doesn’t have anything else to do.

Eight (8) Causes Of Memory Loss That Aren't Alzheimer's

Every wonder if maybe you or a loved one is starting to develop Alzheimer's?? This article can give you some things to consider before jumping to the wrong diagnoses.

Causes of Memory Loss That Aren't Alzheimer's | Caring.com

Video: “Why The Left’s Global Warming Agenda Is Flat Out Wrong”

This 10 minute video is a great watch.  Dr. Roy Spencer tells us why the Global Warming hoax is totally wrong.

<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vvObfrs3qoE?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vvObfrs3qoE?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object>

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a16br1

Don't Worry About Safety On Your Flight...

The TSA has now figured out that 6 year old kids, Catholic Nuns, 95 year old adults in wheelchairs are the one to watch out for. Never mind the person who is using invalid boarding passes and fake IDs.......

Amplify’d from michellemalkin.com

Meanwhile, as the TSA Was Busy Keeping the Skies Safe from Little Girls and the Elderly…

By Doug Powers  •  June 30, 2011 12:43 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

Six year old girls? Check. 95-year-old wheelchair-bound women in adult diapers? Check.

Nigerian men with no ID carrying multiple expired boarding passes not in their own names? Ch… wait, where’d he go?

CBS New York:

CBS News has confirmed that authorities are looking into a shocking security breach that took place at John F. Kennedy International Airport last week. Investigators say Olajide Oluwaseun Noibi, a Nigerian, boarded Virgin America Flight 415 to Los Angeles without a valid passport or identification, using an expired boarding pass for a flight the day before that belonged to someone else. Officials say Noibi got through security and was able to board the plane. No one noticed until the flight was airborne when a flight attendant realized Noibi was sitting in a seat that was supposed to be vacant.

The story from ABC:

TSA Joke of the Week:

Q: Which does the TSA consider to be the greatest threat to air security — Al Qaeda or Hamas?

A: Depends Read more at michellemalkin.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a16bnf

Just Some More Of The Two Faces Of Obama

As another example of what Obama says today and what he says tomorrow never being the same... Just read this....

Amplify’d from michellemalkin.com

Did Obama Forget Those Private Jet Tax Breaks He Just Denounced Were Created By His Own Stimulus Plan?

By Doug Powers  •  June 29, 2011 04:37 PM

**Written by Doug Powers

Before signing the stimulus bill (aka “Porkulus”) in February of 2009, White House Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton said that, even though the president probably hadn’t read the entire 1,079 bill cover-to-cover, he knew it was okay to sign because he had “a team of the best legislative and economic experts in the country who advised him.”

Apparently Obama didn’t check with them before letting loose on private jet tax breaks at today’s press conference.

From the Heritage Foundation:

The chief economic culprit of President Obama’s Wednesday press conference was undoubtedly “corporate jets.” He mentioned them on at least six occasions, each time offering their owners as an example of a group that should be paying more in taxes. “I think it’s only fair to ask an oil company or a corporate jet owner that has done so well,” the president stated at one point, “to give up that tax break that no other business enjoys.” But the corporate jet tax break to which Obama was referring – called “accelerated depreciation,” and a popular Democratic foil of late – was created by his own stimulus package.

More background on that here.

“The stimulus is working as intended! Well, except for that part… and that part… and…” Read more at michellemalkin.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a16bn8